The Short List of What Stays Ours

Eighty-four posts of things being taken. Today, the list of what isn’t, and I want to warn you in advance that it’s shorter than the essays in this genre usually claim, because most of those lists are assembled by working backwards from a comforting conclusion.

The rule I used is strict. To make the list, a thing has to be ours because of what we are rather than because of anything we’re better at. Anything that depends on being more capable is a temporary holding, and the last eighty posts explain why. So no creativity, no empathy, no wisdom, none of the usual entries, because every one of those is a performance that something else can produce, and several of them already are.

Here’s what survived the rule.

Being the one who was there. Presence isn’t a skill, it’s a fact about location and attention, and it can’t be delegated without becoming a different thing. A machine can write a better letter to your dying friend and cannot be the person sitting in the chair. Whatever your relationships are made of, a substantial part of it is the accumulated evidence that you chose to spend irreplaceable hours in specific rooms, and that evidence is not forgeable because it isn’t information. It’s a record of what you did with a life that only runs once.

Mortality, which sounds like a strange thing to put in the keep column. But it’s what makes any of this cost something. An hour you spend is an hour of a finite number, and that’s precisely why giving one to someone means anything at all. A being with unlimited time and unlimited copies can be generous in every observable way and cannot make that particular gesture, because for it, nothing is spent. Our shortness is the unit our currency of care is denominated in.

The view from inside. There is something it is like to be you, this morning, in this weather, and it isn’t a report and can’t be transmitted. Whether machines have any version of this is one of the genuinely open questions and I’m not going to pretend to settle it in a paragraph. What I can say is that yours is yours in a way that doesn’t depend on how the question resolves, and that the entire content of a human life, as lived rather than as summarized, happens in there.

Bodies, and everything that runs through them. Touch, food, exhaustion after a long walk, the specific pleasure of cold water. These aren’t achievements and can’t be outcompeted, and they’re a much larger share of a good life than the people who write about the future tend to allow. Most of what has ever made anybody happy is on this line and always was.

And that’s the list. Four things, and you’ll notice none of them is an ability, an accomplishment, or a form of status. That’s the finding, and it’s less consoling than it looks: everything I could defend is something we share with every human who has ever lived, including the ones who had nothing. The dignity we’ve built out of being the most capable thing around isn’t on the list, and it can’t be, because it was always a comparative claim and comparative claims expire.

I should say what an honest critic would. Two of those four are arguable. Presence is doing work that a sufficiently good physical system might one day contest, and the view from inside rests on a question nobody has answered. So call it a list of four with two under review, and note that a list of two would still not be nothing.

What I take from having done this exercise, and I did do it rather than just write it, is that the list is not a consolation prize. It’s the actual thing. Read any account of a life at the end of it, and what’s in it is people, presence, a body in the world, and the sense of time having been spent on something. The capabilities we’re losing were never what any of that was made of. We just organized our self-respect around them, because for ten thousand years they were also how we ate.

Tonight’s exercise, and it’s the shortest in the series. Take the four and rank them by how much of your last week they actually occupied. Then notice where the rest of the week went, and whether it went to the things on the list or to the things this series says are leaving. That gap is not a prediction about the future. It’s available today, and it was available before any of this started.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.