The Good Ending Is Also Strange

Suppose it works. Not the compromised version, the real one: systems far beyond us that genuinely hold our interests, applied to every problem we’ve never solved. This is the ending I want, it’s not absurd, and it’s the hardest of the six to write about honestly, which is why it took me sixty-eight posts to get here.

Start with what it actually buys, and take it slowly, because the scale gets waved past in a sentence and it deserves better. Every disease that currently takes children takes no more children. The cancers, the dementias, the rare conditions with no research funding because there aren’t enough sufferers to make a market, all of them worked, in parallel, by something that doesn’t get tired or need a grant. Then the physical problems: energy that’s clean and effectively unlimited, materials that make things we can’t currently build, agriculture that doesn’t depend on a good year. Then the coordination problems, which have always been the ones that kill the most people, because famine is usually distribution and war is usually a failure to make a credible promise.

If you find yourself flinching from that paragraph, notice the flinch. A lot of thoughtful people have trained themselves to treat this vision as marketing, because it usually is marketing, and the reflex is healthy right up until it stops you from wanting the good thing. Anyone whose reaction to no more childhood cancer is a raised eyebrow has let their skepticism eat something it shouldn’t have.

The conditions this needs are the most demanding on the list, and I have to be straight about that. It requires solving alignment properly rather than approximately, in systems nobody can read, before capability outruns the checking. It requires the ones who get there first to hold a broad conception of human interest rather than a narrow or national one. And it requires the transition to be survived, meaning the twenty years of drift, dependency, and disruption that Act 2 described don’t have to be avoided, they have to be lived through without the four conditions of control eroding past recovery. Everything I’ve spent this series worrying about sits between here and there.

Now the strangeness, and I want to separate it carefully from an objection, because it isn’t one. In this ending nothing is taken and nobody is harmed, and there’s still something to sit with. Every source of meaning humans have ever had was tangled up with necessity. Work mattered because things needed doing. Expertise mattered because someone had to know. Courage mattered because outcomes were uncertain and could go badly. In the good ending all of that is intact as experience and gone as function: you can still learn the violin, and the learning is real, and nobody anywhere needs you to. Yesterday’s fictional teacher was describing a worse version of this, and the good ending doesn’t remove the shape she was describing. It just makes it kind.

And I distrust my own discomfort here, for the reason a previous post gave. The idea that struggle is necessary for meaning is a claim mostly made by people whose struggles were optional. The billions who have lived and died in genuine want were not thereby enriched, and if you offered any of them this ending they would take it without a second’s philosophy, and they would be right. Whatever we lose in this scenario is worth less than what a single century of medicine gains, and anyone who tells you otherwise should be asked what they’ve gone without.

What I’d keep, and it’s the honest residue rather than a complaint, is a small grief with no villain in it. Being saved by something that outgrew you is different from saving yourself, and both a child and a species feel that difference. It’s the feeling of being loved by a parent who is competent in ways you’ll never be, which is a good feeling with an ache in it, and which every human being has already survived.

How likely? Lower than I’d like and higher than the tone of this series suggests. Call it real but not the default, and note that the difference between it and the comfortable ending from last week may be smaller than it looks, since they share most of their features and differ mainly on whether we’re consulted. That’s a thinner line than anyone building this is currently drawing, and where it falls is being decided now by people optimizing for something else entirely.

Tonight’s exercise. Take the good ending as given, fully, no catch. Everything solved, nobody hurt, all of it free. Now answer one question: what do you do on Wednesday? Not the first month, which is easy and involves travel. The ordinary Wednesday of the fifteenth year. If you have a real answer, that’s what survives all of this, and you should probably be doing more of it now. If you don’t, that’s worth knowing too, because the good ending is the one we’re all supposedly working toward and almost nobody has thought about what it’s like to live in.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.